You are using Science Of Synthesis as a Guest.
Please login to access the full content or check if you have access via37.2.1.1.2.1 Variation 1: With Hydrogen Peroxide
Please login to access the full content or check if you have access via
Adolfsson, H., Science of Synthesis, (2008) 37, 234.
As stated in Section 37.2.1.1.1.2, the use of early transition-metal complexes in combination with aqueous hydrogen peroxide as the terminal oxidant is often problematic due to the inherent oxophilicity of such metals. However, Katsuki has reported a significant breakthrough in the field of titanium-catalyzed asymmetric epoxidation of non-functionalized alkenes.[28–30] The successful catalysts used in this system are based on a combination of titanium and reduced salen-type ligands (also known as salenan and salan, respectively). The oxidation of terminal alkenes, such as vinylbenzene and oct-1-ene, using catalyst 3 results in good yields (90 and 70%, respectively) and excellent stereocontrol (93 and 87% ee, respectively) of the formed epoxides (Scheme 6). Most strikingly, only 1 mol% of the catalyst and 1.05 equivalents of 30% aqueous hydrogen peroxide are required in the epoxidations. When this catalytic system is employed for the epoxidation of 1,2-dihydronaphthalene, the corresponding epoxide is obtained in 99% yield and 99% ee. The dimeric μ-oxo bridged catalyst 3 with its half-reduced salen ligands has a rather elaborate structure and a somewhat complicated preparation procedure. Nevertheless, its stability is remarkable because the homochiral complex keeps its dimeric structure in methanol for more than 24 hours. For a comparison, the corresponding salen-type complex, which is completely inactive as an epoxidation catalyst under these conditions, dissociates immediately into monomeric titanium–salen species in methanol. The difference in catalytic activity observed between catalyst 3 and the corresponding titanium–salen complex is believed to be due to the presence of intramolecular hydrogen bonding between the amine N—H bond and a peroxo group on the metal, which activates the complex for the oxygen transfer to the substrate. A synthetically less challenging and more flexible analogue of catalyst 3 has also been evaluated as an epoxidation catalyst in the presence of aqueous hydrogen peroxide. Complex 4 (Ar1 = Ph) can be easily prepared directly from titanium(IV) isopropoxide and the salan ligand; it is, however, less active and selective than catalyst 3. A structural modification of the initial salan ligand used in the study, however, has led to the development of catalysts that are able to form epoxides with a high degree of stereocontrol. As shown in Scheme 7, catalysts based on complex 4 (Ar1 = 2-MeOC6H4) and 4 (Ar1 = 2-F3CC6H4) are able to epoxidize a range of alkenes in good yields and with excellent selectivity. As in the case of the corresponding manganese–salen systems, Z-substituted alkenes are the preferred substrates. The epoxidation reaction is reported to be stereospecific because no trans-epoxides are formed when starting from Z-alkenes.
Meeeee 8 Meeeeeeeeee Meeeeeeee eeee Meeeeee eeeee-Meee Meeeeee[88–88]
Meeeee 8 Meeeeeeeee Meeeeeee-Meeeeeeee Meeeeeeeeee[88–88]
M8 | M8 | Meeeeeee | Meeeeeeeee | ee (%) | Meeee (%) | Mee |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Me | M | 8 | 8 eee% eeeeeeee, MM8Me8, 88 e | 88 | 88 | [88] |
8 (Me8 = Me) | 8 eee% eeeeeeee, 88 e | 88 | 88 | [88] | ||
8 (Me8 = 8-MeMM8M8)e | 8 e | 88 | 88 | [88] | ||
8 (Me8 = 8-M8MM8M8)e | 8 e | 88 | 88 | [88] | ||
8 | 8 eee% eeeeeeee, MeMMe, 88 e | 88 | 88 | [88] | ||
8 (Me8 = Me) | 8 eee% eeeeeeee, 88 e | 88 | 88 | [88] | ||
8 (Me8 = 8-MeMM8M8)e | 8 e | 88 | 88 | [88] | ||
8 (Me8 = 8-M8MM8M8)e | 8 e | 88 | 88 | [88] | ||
M≡MMe | Me | 8 | 8 eee% eeeeeeee, MeMMe, 88 e | 88 | 88 | [88] |
8 (Me8 = Me) | 8 eee% eeeeeeee, 88 e | 88 | 88 | [88] | ||
8 (Me8 = 8-MeMM8M8)e | 8 e | 88 | 88 | [88] | ||
8 (Me8 = 8-M8MM8M8)e | 8 e | 88 | 88 | [88] | ||
(MM8)8Me | M | 8 | 8 eee% eeeeeeee, MM8Me8, 88 e | 88 | 88 | [88] |
8 (Me8 = Me) | 8 eee% eeeeeeee, 88 e | 88 | 88 | [88] |
e Meeeeeee eeeeeeee ee eeee eeee 8 eee% Me(MeMe)8 eee 8 eee% ee eee eeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeee.
Meeeeeeeeeee Meeeeeeee
Meeeeeeeee Meeeeeee 8; Meeeeee Meeeeeeee Meeee Meeeeeee 8:[88]
Me eeeeeee 8 (8.8 ee, 8 μeee) eee eeeeee (8.8 eeee) eeee eeeeeeeee ee ee eeeeeeeeeee eeeeeee (8.8 eM) eeeee M8. Meeee eeeeeeee ee 88% ee M8M8 (8.888 eeee), eee eeeeeee eee eeeeeee ee ee eee eee eeeeeeeeeee eeee (88–88 e). Mee eeeeeee eee eeeeeee eeeee eeeeeee eeeeeeee eee eee eeeeeee eee eeeeeeee ee eeeeeeeeeeeeee (eeeeee eee, eeeeeee/Me8M 88:8).
References
[28] | Meeeeeeee, M.; Meeeee, M.; Meeee, M.; Meeee, M.; Meeeeee, M., Meeee. Meee., (8888) 888, 8888; Meeee. Meee. Mee. Me., (8888) 88, 8888. |
[29] | Meeeee, M.; Meeeeeeee, M.; Meeee, M.; Meeeeeee, M.; Meeee, M.; Meeeee, M.; Meeee, M.; Meeeeee, M., Meeee. Meee., (8888) 888, 8888; Meeee. Meee. Mee. Me., (8888) 88, 8888. |
[30] | Meeeeeeee, M.; Meeeee, M.; Meeeeee, M., Meeeeee, (8888), 8888. |